If you look at the world of wrist locks and joint locking, you'll notice that some locks require two hands to execute.
How does this fit with an efficient Bruce Lee philosophy? After all, it doesn't make sense to use two of your hands to tie up only one of your enemy's, right?
What follows is a way to tackle the possible dilemma. Let's use the Double Ninety wrist locks as an example. Here are some thoughts to straighten it all out:
1. In a 'fight,' use a lock after you have hit. It's the move that brings
control to the situation. So, you have already done some beating, by the time you effect the wrist lock.
2. When you hold the Double 90 correctly, your enemy should
not be able to even lift a leg for a kick, let alone reach over
with the other hand. You can stop any movement by adding more pain.
3. You can easily morph from a 2-hand Double 90 into a
one-hand control. Just let go with the hand that is pushing at the elbow.
Straighten out his arm, and then bend below where his pinky part
of the hand meets the wrist.
Now, it's a one-hand lock. And it keeps your opponent's other hand even further away from you.
And here's a fourth point that may help ...
4. If you are holding, say the Double 90 with two hands, and your
opponent tries to punch, then you have the hand at his elbow to hit with;
it's very close to a target ... you are already almost there. You can
punch with the hand closest to your opponent's face ... and not give up the lock.
Keith